| 
				 
				
				Ex parte (Judges decision not requiring all parties to be 
				present) 
				
				
				Df - McCardle 
				
				
				Party Description 
				
				o        
				
				 McCardle 
				was a newspaper publisher in the post-civil war south. 
				 
				
				
				Arrested 
				
				o        
				
				
				He was arrested for under charges of libel; distributing the 
				peace; inciting insurrection, disorder, and violence; and 
				impeding reconstruction. 
				
				
				5th Argument Argument 
				
				o        
				
				
				McCardle argued that the Reconcstruction Acts were an 
				unconstitutional violation of his rights under the 5th Amendment 
				because he wasn't a member of the military and 
				shouldn't be tried in a military court. 
				
				
				Brought Habeas Corpus 
				
				o        
				
				
				McCardle brought a habeas corpus act under an Act of Congress of 
				1867 which authorized the federal courts to grant habeus corpus 
				to anyone restrained in violation of the Constitution, and 
				gave the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction over such actions.
				 
				
				
				Congress Feared 
				
				o        
				
				
				Congress feared that the case would be vehicle for invalidating 
				the reconstruction plan. 
				
				
				Repealed Habeas Corpus 
				
				o        
				
				
				So, before the case was ruled upon, Congress there enacted a 
				statute that repealed the provision of the 1867 habeas corpus 
				act that McCardle invoked. 
				
				o   
				
				
				Habeas Corpus gave the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction to 
				hear cases where a person seeks relief from unlawful detention.
				 
				
				   | 
				
				 
				
				Article III, Section  Supreme Courts Appellate Jurisdiction 
				
				o        
				
				
				The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is derived from 
				Article III, Section 2 of the constitution, not from acts of 
				Congress. 
				
				  
				
				
				Exception Congress shall make to appellate jurisdiction 
				
				o        
				
				
				It is true that the appellate jurisdiction is granted by the 
				constitution, but in the same article, it is made expressly 
				subject to such exceptions 
				and under such regulations as Congress shall make.
				 
				
				o        
				
				
				Thus, Congress has the power 
				to expand and limit the scope of the appellate jurisdiction 
				of the Supreme Court.  
				
				o        
				
				
				Congress was acting clearly within its power in both granting 
				and then repealing the specific jurisdiction to review habeas 
				corpus cases from the Circuit Courts pursuant to the Act of 
				1867.  
				
				o        
				
				
				The Act of 1868 does not affect the appellate jurisdiction with 
				regard to any other cases. 
				
				  
				
				
				What does it mean to repeal an act 
				
				o        
				
				
				In this case, the repeal of the act necessarily removed 
				jurisdiction.  
				
				o        
				
				
				Without jurisdiction, the Court cannot proceed; the only thing 
				it can do is announce that fact and dismiss the cause of action.
				 
				
				o        
				
				
				When a legislative act is repealed, it is as if it had never 
				existed except in transactions past and closed.  
				
				o        
				
				
				Thus, no judgment can be rendered in a suit after repeal of the 
				act under which it was brought. 
				
				  
				
				
				Holding 
				
				o        
				
				
				Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  |